Jim Driscoll's Blog

Notes on Technology and the Web

Eval JavaScript in a global context

leave a comment »

Even though it’s considered bad practice, it’s often handy to eval code in JavaScript.  And in my case, it was simply necessary, since the JSF specification requires eval of scripts. And it’s also necessary to execute those evaluated scripts in the global scope. It’s not as easy as it first looks.

For our first naive implementation, we’d simply used eval(src) in our first pass at the implementation.

This is utterly wrong, and to understand why, you’ll need to understand scopes. JavaScript has what you can think of as two different scopes – function scope, where you’re executing something in the context of a function, and global scope, where you’re executing something in a global context – for instance, if I say var j = 1; within a function’s scope, then the variable j is set to 1 within that function. If I say the same expression, var j = 1 within the global scope, then j is set to 1 everywhere in the program – in every function, provided that that function doesn’t define a j variable in its local scope. In browsers, the global context is window – this is the default object that everything gets hung off of if you don’t specify any other object.

So, when we said eval(src), we were executing the src scripts within the local scope of the function where eval was called – that meant that I would be getting different results when variables were declared and set than would be expected – in fact, for some cases, it just seemed like the scripts weren’t being executed at all.

So, what to do? Well, as is usual for the browser JavaScript, there’s Internet Explorer, then there’s everyone else. As is usual, IE, the crazy cousin Larry of the browser world, has a convenient, well intentioned, and utterly nonstandard way to do this: window.execScript(src) It works great – and the other ways I’ll detail here break rather infamously, so use this non-standard function on IE.

For more standards-respecting browsers, the way to do this should be to use the call function, which is a standard function attached to every Function object. So, eval.call(window, src) should work. But to understand why, it’s important to know about context, in addition to scope. Every function call has it’s own context: this is the object that’s represented by the special value this. When we use the call function, the first parameter is the context object we’ll use for this. This is handy for all kinds of purposes, but for us, it’s just nice to use to set the context to the window object – which, you’ll recall, is the global.

Sadly, eval.call(window,src) breaks on Chrome – it complains about contexts not matching. Odd – and I was unable to Google up why this might be so. But a couple lucky guesses later, and I discovered that window.eval.call(window,src) works on all non-IE browsers. Now, when I say “var j = 1”, the window[j] is the variable that’s set… So, that’s good. Why do we have to add the extra window. on Chrome? Not sure – I could guess, but it’s too likely to be wrong.

At this point, I thought we’d licked the problem. No such luck. Sure, global variables are getting set, but it turns out that if you say: alert(this) – then you would correctly receive the global object back on Chrome and Safari, but not Firefox – there, you’d get back the object that was the enclosing object before the call function got called. Very odd, and likely a bug in their implementation.

With a little help from Werner Punz, we figured out that they best way to get around this issue is to wrap the calling function in an anonymous globally scoped function. Like the Chrome bug, I can guess why this might work, but it would only be a guess. Better not to clutter up the internets with more guesses – I’ll just stick to what I know works.

Here’s the code that I now use to do a global eval:

var globalEval = function globalEval(src) {
    if (window.execScript) {
    var fn = function() {

Hope this list of tricks is helpful to someone else who’s looking to do something similar.

(This article originally published on my java.net blog on September 8, 2009.)


Written by jamesgdriscoll

February 9, 2010 at 10:17 PM

Posted in JavaScript, web

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: